Practical 9: Selecting Data

Selecting & Linking Data

Important

This practical focusses on data linkage! You will have seen quite a bit of this of these across the preceding three to four weeks, but they were picked up in an ad-hoc way, here we try to systematise things a bit. We’re also going to look at alternatives to loading the entire data set into memory in Python: using the DuckDB driver we can perform a lot of operations ‘outside’ of Python’s memory and processing limits while still benefiting from reproducibility (the commands are stored in the Python script) and access (we can bring the filtered, linked data into Python when we need to do so).

🔗 Connections

We’re going to look at how data can be joined (linked) to other data using a range of techniques: pure Python (spatial and non-spatial) and SQL (non-spatial only).

Preamble

ymd  = '20250615'
city = 'London'
host = 'https://orca.casa.ucl.ac.uk'
url  = f'{host}/~jreades/data/{ymd}-{city}-listings.geoparquet'

import pandas as pd
import geopandas as gpd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

from pathlib import Path

from pathlib import Path
from requests import get
from functools import wraps

def check_cache(f):
    @wraps(f)
    def wrapper(src:str, dst:str, min_size=100) -> Path:
        if src.find('?') == -1:
            url = Path(src)
        else:
            url = Path(src[:src.find('?')])
        fn  = url.name  # Extract the filename
        dsn = Path(f"{dst}/{fn}") # Destination filename
        if dsn.is_file() and dsn.stat().st_size > min_size:
            print(f"+ {dsn} found locally!")
            return(dsn)
        else:
            print(f"+ {dsn} not found, downloading!")
            return(f(src, dsn))
    return wrapper

@check_cache
def cache_data(src:Path, dst:Path) -> str:
    """Downloads a remote file.
    
    The function sits between the 'read' step of a pandas or geopandas
    data frame and downloading the file from a remote location. The idea
    is that it will save it locally so that you don't need to remember to
    do so yourself. Subsequent re-reads of the file will return instantly
    rather than downloading the entire file for a second or n-th itme.
    
    Parameters
    ----------
    src : str
        The remote *source* for the file, any valid URL should work.
    dst : str
        The *destination* location to save the downloaded file.
        
    Returns
    -------
    str
        A string representing the local location of the file.
    """
      
    # Create any missing directories in dest(ination) path
    # -- os.path.join is the reverse of split (as you saw above)
    # but it doesn't work with lists... so I had to google how
    # to use the 'splat' operator! os.makedirs creates missing
    # directories in a path automatically.
    if not dst.parent.exists():
        dst.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
        
    # Download and write the file
    with dst.open(mode='wb') as file:
        response = get(src)
        file.write(response.content)
        
    print(' + Done downloading...')

    return dst.resolve()

ddir     = Path('data/geo')
pqt      = url.replace('.geo','.')

Selecting Data in Pandas

In this section we are loading a parquet file using pandas and taking advantage of Python’s ‘chaining’ functionality (<object>.<method>().<method>()...) to return the first few rows of a data frame using head. The thing to notice is that we’re not even bothering to save the result of this command into a variable (thus the lack of a df = in the code). We’re doing this here solely so that you can compare pandas and DuckDB performance and syntax across each of the following steps.

A simple query

%%time 

pd.read_parquet(f'{pqt}').head(3)

CPU times: user 223 ms, sys: 104 ms, total: 327 ms
Wall time: 744 ms

	id	listing_url	last_scraped	name	description	host_id	host_name	host_since	host_location	host_is_superhost	...	amenities	price	minimum_nights	maximum_nights	availability_365	number_of_reviews	first_review	last_review	review_scores_rating	reviews_per_month
0	1126718007114818432	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1126718007114818431	2024-06-14	Cozy house in Northolt	Located 1 minute away from a bus stop and 10 m...	380326752	Sadikshya	2020-12-15	None	False	...	["Kitchen", "Free parking on premises", "Indoo...	48.0	3	365	269	0.0	NaT	NaT	NaN	NaN
1	702589406864297984	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/702589406864297985	2024-06-15	Up in the sky in London!	One bedroom with double bed, desk and with th...	77760754	Lena	2016-06-14	London, United Kingdom	True	...	["Free parking on premises", "First aid kit", ...	42.0	1	365	146	83.0	2023-08-30	2024-06-13	4.94	8.56
2	1122535727514526848	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1122535727514526769	2024-06-14	Luxury Stays in SE London (2bed)	Welcome to Our Home has recently refurbished o...	322107481	Nick And Sandy,	2019-12-29	None	False	...	["Kitchen", "Free parking on premises", "Dedic...	150.0	6	365	162	0.0	NaT	NaT	NaN	NaN

3 rows × 32 columns

This should (I hope) be trivial to read now and (I hope) you have what seems like pretty good performance in the range of 150-175 milliseconds.

Selecting columns

To load a columnar subset of the data we have two options:

Load all the data and then subset (which always happens with CSV files but is optional with other formats)
Load only the columns we care about (which is possible with parquet files)

And in code these are implemented as:

Load then filter

%%time

pd.read_parquet(f'{pqt}')[['listing_url', 'price', 'number_of_reviews', 'property_type', 'host_name']].head(5)

CPU times: user 190 ms, sys: 72.9 ms, total: 263 ms
Wall time: 690 ms

	listing_url	price	number_of_reviews	property_type	host_name
0	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1126718007114818431	48.0	0.0	Private room in home	Sadikshya
1	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/702589406864297985	42.0	83.0	Private room in casa particular	Lena
2	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1122535727514526769	150.0	0.0	Entire rental unit	Nick And Sandy,
3	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/904867371314200140	104.0	14.0	Entire condo	Suite
4	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/809481748064671711	82.0	5.0	Entire condo	Elisa

Not bad, not bad…

Filter then load

%%time

pd.read_parquet(f'{pqt}', columns=['listing_url', 'price', 'number_of_reviews', 'property_type', 'host_name']).head(5)

CPU times: user 89.1 ms, sys: 41.5 ms, total: 131 ms
Wall time: 579 ms

	listing_url	price	number_of_reviews	property_type	host_name
0	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1126718007114818431	48.0	0.0	Private room in home	Sadikshya
1	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/702589406864297985	42.0	83.0	Private room in casa particular	Lena
2	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1122535727514526769	150.0	0.0	Entire rental unit	Nick And Sandy,
3	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/904867371314200140	104.0	14.0	Entire condo	Suite
4	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/809481748064671711	82.0	5.0	Entire condo	Elisa

Whoa! Notice the difference in the time needed to complete the operation!!! We just cut the time by upwards of 80%!

Adding a constraint

So that is performance for loading data, now let’s see what happens when we start subsetting the data by row as well as by column.

%%time 

df = pd.read_parquet(f'{pqt}', columns=['listing_url', 'price', 'number_of_reviews', 'property_type', 'host_name'])
df[(df.price < 250) & (df.number_of_reviews > 0) & (df.property_type=='Entire home/apt')].head(5)

CPU times: user 104 ms, sys: 67 ms, total: 171 ms
Wall time: 1.45 s

	listing_url	price	number_of_reviews	property_type	host_name
52602	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/42969992	204.0	6.0	Entire home/apt	Duda
69149	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/799913652643569180	122.0	3.0	Entire home/apt	Travelnest
75804	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/20433512	199.0	162.0	Entire home/apt	Nicky

For improved legibility you can also write this as:

df = pd.read_parquet(f'{pqt}', columns=['listing_url', 'price', 'number_of_reviews', 'last_review', 'host_name'])
df[
    (df.price < 250) & 
    (df.number_of_reviews > 0) & 
    (df.property_type=='Entire home/apt')
].head(5)

Notice here that we are using three conditions to filter the data as well as a column filter on loading to minimise the amount of data loaded into memory. Applying the filters simultaneously will also make it easy to see what you’ve done (you aren’t applying each one separately) and to adjust the overall cleaning process.

This filter is fairly straightforward and performance should have been only slightly slower than doing the column subset in the first place, but things get a bit more complicated when you want to aggregate the return…

Aggregating the return

There is a lot to unpack here, and notice that it takes three steps to achieve our goal of selecting, grouping, aggregating, sorting, and printing out the ten most frequent combinations of room and property type, although we could reduce it to two if we really wanted to do so (at the cost of some legibility).

%%time 

df = pd.read_parquet(f'{pqt}', columns=['property_type','room_type','number_of_reviews','price'])
df = df[
    (df.price < 1050) & 
    (df.number_of_reviews > 0)
]
df.groupby(
        by=['room_type','property_type'],
        observed=True
    ).agg(
        freq = ("property_type", "count"),
        median_price = ("price", "median"),
).reset_index().sort_values(
        by=['freq','room_type','property_type'], ascending=[False,True,True]
    ).head(5)

CPU times: user 89.4 ms, sys: 48.2 ms, total: 138 ms
Wall time: 670 ms

	room_type	property_type	freq	median_price
18	Entire home/apt	Entire rental unit	18541	166.0
10	Entire home/apt	Entire condo	5697	170.0
51	Private room	Private room in home	5681	55.0
56	Private room	Private room in rental unit	5154	64.0
14	Entire home/apt	Entire home	3835	240.0

Hopefully the first two steps are fairly clear, so let’s focus on the final one:

Group By

This is a reasonably intelligible step in which we group the data loaded by room and property:

dfg = df.groupby(
        by=['room_type','property_type'],
        observed=True
    )
dfg

The order here matters: groupby(by=[<A>,<B>]) does not return the same result as groupby(by=[<B>,<A>]). Try it:

df.groupby(
        by=['property_type','room_type'],
        observed=True
    )

The other thing to note here is the observed=True. This is a nice bit of additional functionality that, if you set it to False will return a number for all possible combinations, inserting a zero if that combintaion is not observed in the data. That’s useful if non-observations (i.e. there was no data for this group) is relevant to your data presentation or subsequent modelling/statistical tests¹.

Agg

The agg step aggregates the data specified in the functions:

dfg.agg(
        freq = ("property_type", "count"),
        median_price = ("price", "median"),
)

Pandas offers a lot of different ways to do this, but the above approach is perhaps the most flexible since we are telling Pandas to apply the count function to the property_type field and assign it to a column called freq, and to apply the median function to the price field and assign that to a column called median_price.

‘Degroup’

In order to do anything further with the aggregated data you will almost always want to convert your GroupedDataFrame back to a regular DataFrame and that means resetting the index reset_index() – this is just one of those things to learn about grouped data in Pandas.

Sort

Finally, to sort the data you need to sort_values, where by specifies the fields you want to sort on and ascending is a matching (optional) list that specifies the sort order for each sort column. If you just want to sort everything in ascending order then you don’t need to specify the ascending values, and if you wanted to sort everything in descending order then it’s just ascending=False.

Selecting Data in DuckDB

That last example may have left you despairing of every being able to select/filter/aggregate/derive your data, but there is another way that is often far simpler if you are: a) willing to learn a different language, and b) willing to work with data in different formats. And that’s all thanks to Parquet and DuckDB.

The combination of parquet files and in-memory databases (DuckDB is just one of these) has fundamentally reshaped my workflow. Parquet and Apache Arrow are closely related but, in short, when you want to save large data sets in an easy-to-access and fast-to-query format then Parquet should be your default choice. DuckDB gives you a way to treat Parquet files as database tables and run queries against it (or them!) using standard SQL. You can install DuckDB on the command-line, but you can also query it from within Python using the appropriate module.

A first query

Let’s see a quick demonstration:

%%time 

import duckdb as db

query = f'''
SELECT *
FROM read_parquet('{pqt}') 
LIMIT 3;
'''

db.sql(query).to_df()

CPU times: user 748 ms, sys: 39.2 ms, total: 787 ms
Wall time: 804 ms

	id	listing_url	last_scraped	name	description	host_id	host_name	host_since	host_location	host_is_superhost	...	amenities	price	minimum_nights	maximum_nights	availability_365	number_of_reviews	first_review	last_review	review_scores_rating	reviews_per_month
0	1126718007114818432	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1126718007114818431	2024-06-14	Cozy house in Northolt	Located 1 minute away from a bus stop and 10 m...	380326752	Sadikshya	2020-12-15	None	False	...	["Kitchen", "Free parking on premises", "Indoo...	48.0	3	365	269	0.0	NaT	NaT	NaN	NaN
1	702589406864297984	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/702589406864297985	2024-06-15	Up in the sky in London!	One bedroom with double bed, desk and with th...	77760754	Lena	2016-06-14	London, United Kingdom	True	...	["Free parking on premises", "First aid kit", ...	42.0	1	365	146	83.0	2023-08-30	2024-06-13	4.94	8.56
2	1122535727514526848	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1122535727514526769	2024-06-14	Luxury Stays in SE London (2bed)	Welcome to Our Home has recently refurbished o...	322107481	Nick And Sandy,	2019-12-29	None	False	...	["Kitchen", "Free parking on premises", "Dedic...	150.0	6	365	162	0.0	NaT	NaT	NaN	NaN

3 rows × 32 columns

The timing code should already show a significant improvement over pandas-only code (on my laptop it is 90ms vs. 160ms), and now let’s unpack what’s happening:

We import the duckdb library as db.
We set up a SQL query using a multi-line f-string
We use DuckDb to execute the query and return a pandas dataframe (df)

What’s particularly elegant here (and quite different from trying to talk to a Postres or MySQL database) is that there’s no connect-execute-collect pattern; we just build the query and execute it!

I do declare…

Now let’s take a look at the SQL query… SQL is what’s called a declarative language, meaning that it is about the logic we want the program to follow rather than the ‘flow’ of execution. Python supports some declarative elements but is more commonly seen as an imperative language supporting procedural or functional approaches. This is a long way of saying: SQL won’t look like Python even though we’re executing SQL from within Python.

So our query (with added line numbers for clarity) looked liked this:

SELECT *
FROM read_parquet('{pqt}') 
LIMIT 3

Line-by-line this means:

Select all columns (* == everything>`)
From the parquet file (<table location>)
Limit the return to 3 rows (LIMIT <row count>)

Let’s look at some variations…

Selecting columns

%%time 

query = f'''
SELECT listing_url, price, number_of_reviews, last_review, host_name 
FROM read_parquet('{pqt}') 
LIMIT 5;
'''

db.sql(query).to_df()

CPU times: user 13.8 ms, sys: 4.9 ms, total: 18.7 ms
Wall time: 216 ms

	listing_url	price	number_of_reviews	last_review	host_name
0	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1126718007114818431	48.0	0.0	NaT	Sadikshya
1	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/702589406864297985	42.0	83.0	2024-06-13	Lena
2	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/1122535727514526769	150.0	0.0	NaT	Nick And Sandy,
3	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/904867371314200140	104.0	14.0	2024-05-17	Suite
4	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/809481748064671711	82.0	5.0	2024-05-26	Elisa

Even though it looked like pandas performed massively better when we updated our query to filter then load, DuckDB is even faster! I get that DuckDB takes about 25% the time that pandas does.

SELECT listing_url, price, number_of_reviews, last_review, host_name 
FROM read_parquet('{pqt}') 
LIMIT 5;

It should be fairly easy to see how the query has changed from last time, but line-by-line this means:

Select a set of columns from the table in the order specified (SELECT <column 1>, <column 30>, <column 5>...)
From the parquet file (FROM <table location>)
Limit the return to 5 rows (LIMIT <row count>)

Adding a constraint

%%time

query = f'''
SELECT listing_url, price, number_of_reviews, last_review, host_name 
FROM read_parquet('{pqt}') 
WHERE price < 250 
AND number_of_reviews > 0
AND property_type='Entire home/apt'
LIMIT 5;
'''

db.sql(query).to_df()

CPU times: user 139 ms, sys: 6.03 ms, total: 145 ms
Wall time: 221 ms

	listing_url	price	number_of_reviews	last_review	host_name
0	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/42969992	204.0	6.0	2024-05-29	Duda
1	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/799913652643569180	122.0	3.0	2023-06-11	Travelnest
2	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/20433512	199.0	162.0	2024-06-05	Nicky

Performance should still be noteable improvement over pandas, though in my simple tests it’s ‘only’ about 30% faster. IF we wanted to be more rigorous about this we’d want to repeat the same operation many times (e.g. hundreds or thousands of time) to account for the fact that during any given query the computer might be doing other things that impact performance.

Anyway, in this query we’ve added three constraints using a WHERE, which is asking DuckDB to find all of the rows where the following things are true:

The price must be less than ($)250/night
The number_of_reviews must be more than 0
The property_type must be Entire home/apt

Aggregating the return

That’s hopefully enough to get you started on selecting data, but databases ‘excel’ at aggregating data in various ways. We aren’t going to get into things like windowing functions or stored procedures here, but even simple aggregates done in DuckDB can vastly improve on the performance of pandas.

Tip

When you aggregate data you need to retrieve every column in the SELECT portion that you GROUP BY in the WHERE portion of the query. This will make sense when you see the examples below… and should also make sense based on the Pandas equivalent above!

%%time

query = f'''
SELECT property_type, room_type, 
    COUNT(*) AS frequency, MEDIAN(price) AS median_price
FROM read_parquet('{pqt}') 
WHERE price < 1000 
AND number_of_reviews > 0
GROUP BY room_type, property_type
ORDER BY frequency DESC, room_type, property_type
LIMIT 5;
'''

db.sql(query).to_df()

CPU times: user 95.6 ms, sys: 4.33 ms, total: 99.9 ms
Wall time: 174 ms

	property_type	room_type	frequency	median_price
0	Entire rental unit	Entire home/apt	18510	166.0
1	Entire condo	Entire home/apt	5692	170.0
2	Private room in home	Private room	5680	55.0
3	Private room in rental unit	Private room	5151	64.0
4	Entire home	Entire home/apt	3819	240.0

Performance is comparable to pandas in my very basic test, but I find the operation more clearly expressed in SQL than pandas. There are quite a few changes to the query here so it’s worth reviewing them in more detail:

SELECT property_type, room_type, 
    COUNT(*) AS freq, MEDIAN(price) AS median_price
FROM read_parquet('{pqt}') 
WHERE price < 1000 
AND number_of_reviews > 0
GROUP BY room_type, property_type
ORDER BY frequency DESC, room_type, property_type
LIMIT 10;

Key things to note:

We have two new aggregate functions:
- COUNT(*) returns a count of the number of rows in each group specified in the GROUP BY clause. We don’t need to specify a column here because * means ‘all rows’.
- MEDIAN(price) returns, unsurprisingly, the median value of the price column for each group specified in the GROUP BY clause.
- Note also the AS frequency which ‘renames’ the column returned by the query; it’s the same concept as the import x as y in Python.
GROUP BY is where the aggregation happens, and here we’re asking DuckDB to take all of the rows selected (WHERE price < 1000 AND number_of_reviews > 0) and group them using the room_type and property_type fields.
ORDER BY orders the returned records by the columns we specify, and they can be either ASCending (the default) or DESCending (descending).

What you should also be noting here is that:

This query returns very quickly compared to the pandas equivalent.
We have been able to express our selection, grouping, and organising criteria very succinctly.

In terms of both speed and intelligibility, there can be quite substantial advantages to moving some of your workflow into a database or a database-like format such as Parquet and then querying that from Python. Databases are designed for the kind of application that Pandas struggles with, and if you get to windowing functions and stored procedures you’ll see how there are situations where something is far easier to express in Python/Pandas than in SQL.

So the trick here is to recognise when you are facing a problem that: a) will benefit from being expressed/tackled in a different language; and b) won’t create undue overhead on your technology ‘stack’. In working with environmental and built environment data I was able to cut the processing time by 80% when I moved the bulk of the data linkage work from Pandas into Parquet+DuckDB. But, by the same token, what’s the point of using Postgres and managing a spatial database to perform a single step in a much longer workflow unless the performance considerations are so massive they outweigh any other issue.

Thinking About Joins

We’re going to look at joining data by attributes first and then look at spatial joins after so that you get a sense of how they behave and differ. However, even where you do have a spatial problem, it can be worth it to manage it as a non-spatial problem to improve the overall performance of your code.

For instance, say you have data from LSOAs and want to be able to aggregate it up to MSOA-level to perform various analyses.

LSOA Table

LSOA Code	Polygon
LSOA1	WKT(…)
LSOA2	WKT(…)
LSOA3	WKT(…)

MSOA Table

MSOA Code	Polygon
MSOA1	WKT(…)
MSOA2	WKT(…)
MSOA3	WKT(…)

The obvious way to do this is as a spatial join something like this:

SELECT m."MSOA Code", SUM(<attribute 1>) AS feature_sum, COUNT(<attribute 2>) AS feature_count  
FROM <lsoa data table> AS l, <msoa data table> AS m  
WHERE ST_Within(l.<lsoa geom>, m.<msoa geom>)
GROUP BY m."MSOA Code";

We’ll get to what’s happening with AS l and AS lkp in a bit more detail below, but the term for this is aliasing and its saves us having to repeatedly type <lsoa data table> by allowing us to use the alias l. But you would run this same query every time you wanted to aggregate something.

This is not the right way to tackle this problem even though you can write the query to give you the correct answer. Spatial queries (as I said in the pre-recorded lectures) are hard, so if you can ‘cache’ the result in a non-spatial format it will save a lot time in the future.

The answer is to run the spatial query once in order to create a ‘lookup table’ which uses the LSOA and MSOA codes (and you can even add Boroughs, Regions, OAs, and so on later if you like!) to tell you if a LSOA falls inside a borough or MSOA. So you perform the hard spatial query just once to create the lookup table, and thereafter you are using a fast non-spatial query.

In this case your lookup table will look like this…

Lookup Table

LSOA Code	MSOA Code	Borough Code
LSOA1	MSOA1	BORO1
LSOA2	MSOA1	BORO1
LSOA3	MSOA2	BORO1

Now you can do any kind of spatial aggregation you want without having to incur the costs of running a spatial query using something like:

SELECT lkp."MSOA Code", SUM(<attribute 1>) AS feature_sum, COUNT(<attribute 2>) AS feature_count  
FROM <lsoa data table> AS l, <lookup table> AS lkp  
WHERE l."LSOA Code" = lkp."LSOA Code" 
GROUP BY lkp."MSOA Code";

You can also use this as a foundation for creating a VIEW or a [MATERIALIZED VIEW](https://www.databricks.com/glossary/materialized-views), but that’s an advanced topic for managing your data more efficiently in an operational environment rather than a research-oriented one.

Spatial DuckDB

DuckDB also now supports spatial queries via the SPATIAL extension. Performance is not that of a tuned Postgres+PostGIS database, but the overhead of creating such a tuned database often exceeds the benefit for ad-hoc querying. Basically, Postgres+PostGIS is great if you’re a company such as Booking.com, Airbnb, or OpenStreetMap, but it’s most likely overkill for offline, read-only applications.

Additional Data

For the rest of this notebook we need three data sets about MSOAs (which are statistical neighbourhoods that we’ll treat as a proxy for ‘real’ neighbourhoods). The first two are non-spatial:

msoa_names_url = 'https://houseofcommonslibrary.github.io/msoanames/MSOA-Names-1.20.csv'
msoa_popst_url = 'https://orca.casa.ucl.ac.uk/~jreades/data/sapemsoaquinaryagetablefinal.xlsx'

msoa_nms = pd.read_csv( cache_data(msoa_names_url, 'data') )

# This one can't be cached because we need to access
# an Excel sheet name and the cache_data function isn't
# smart enough to handle this use case.
msoa_pq = Path('data/MSOA_population_estimates.parquet')
if msoa_pq.exists():
    msoa_df = pd.read_parquet(msoa_pq)
else:
    msoa_df = pd.read_excel(msoa_popst_url, sheet_name="Mid-2022 MSOA 2021", header=3)
    msoa_df.to_parquet(msoa_pq)

print(f"msoa_df  has {msoa_df.shape[0]:,} rows and {msoa_df.shape[1]:,} columns.")
print(f"msoa_nms has {msoa_nms.shape[0]:,} rows and {msoa_nms.shape[1]:,} columns.")

+ data/MSOA-Names-1.20.csv found locally!
msoa_df  has 7,264 rows and 43 columns.
msoa_nms has 7,201 rows and 6 columns.

We also need some geodata:

msoa_gpkg = gpd.read_file( cache_data(f'{host}/~jreades/data/MSOA-2011.gpkg', ddir) ).to_crs('epsg:27700')

+ data/geo/MSOA-2011.gpkg found locally!

The preferred solution

To keep it simple: you should assume that non-spatial joins are always going to be faster than spatial ones, even in a performant spatial database. Asking if one number is less than another, or if a piece of text is found in another piece of text, is much simpler than asking if one object falls within the boundaries of another. Spatial databases are fast and very cool, but if you can express your problem non-spatially it will be faster to solve it that way too.

Non-Spatial Joins In Pandas

Pandas distinguishes between several types of what SQL would call a ‘join’: the process of linking two data sets. Depending on what you want to do, this will fall into one of the merge, join, concatenate, or compare functions:

concat simply appends one data frame to another and won’t be discussed further, but keep in mind that you can concatenate horizontally and vertically (across and down), and that having named indexes can cause consternation. You would find it most useful for appending columns to a data set (appending rows should be approached differently) or extending a data set for year $n$ with data from year $n+1$…
merge is what we normally want when we want to do something similar to a SQL join. You should refer back to the lecture for the differences between ‘one-to-one’, ‘one-to-many’, and ‘many-to-many’. Note too that merging is a function of the pandas library and not a method of a data frame.

Joining by attribute

So in our case, to join the two MSOA data sets we’re going to need to match the MSOA codes which have (slightly) different names in the two datasets:

%%time

rs = pd.merge(msoa_df, msoa_nms[['msoa11cd','msoa11hclnm','Laname']], left_on='MSOA 2021 Code', right_on='msoa11cd', how='left')
print(f"Result set has {rs.shape[0]:,} rows and {rs.shape[1]:,} columns.")
rs.head(3)

Result set has 7,264 rows and 46 columns.
CPU times: user 2.39 ms, sys: 302 μs, total: 2.7 ms
Wall time: 2.64 ms

	LAD 2021 Code	LAD 2021 Name	MSOA 2021 Code	MSOA 2021 Name	Total	F0 to 4	F5 to 9	F10 to 14	F15 to 19	F20 to 24	...	M60 to 64	M65 to 69	M70 to 74	M75 to 79	M80 to 84	M85 to 89	M90 and over	msoa11cd	msoa11hclnm	Laname
0	E06000001	Hartlepool	E02002483	Hartlepool 001	10323	265	296	356	302	238	...	281	254	210	180	93	82	28	E02002483	Clavering	Hartlepool
1	E06000001	Hartlepool	E02002484	Hartlepool 002	10460	325	349	295	340	283	...	363	276	248	175	86	49	28	E02002484	Headland & West View	Hartlepool
2	E06000001	Hartlepool	E02002485	Hartlepool 003	8040	238	287	295	262	225	...	272	198	159	143	61	31	12	E02002485	Jesmond	Hartlepool

3 rows × 46 columns

But wait! There’s an issue lurking in the data!

print(f"There are {rs.msoa11hclnm.isna().sum()} missing MSOA Names!")

There are 184 missing MSOA Names!

Can you work out why this has happened? There is a clue in the column names!

There’s no way to solve this problem except by changing the code to use this URL instead for the MSOA Names.

Constraining the Join

We can also try to constrain the result set to one LA thanks to data in the MSOA Names database:

%%time 

la_nm = 'Waltham Forest'
sdf   = msoa_nms[msoa_nms.Laname==la_nm][['msoa11cd','msoa11hclnm','Laname']].copy()

rs = pd.merge(msoa_df, sdf, left_on='MSOA 2021 Code', right_on='msoa11cd', how='inner')
print(f"Result set has {rs.shape[0]:,} rows and {rs.shape[1]:,} columns.")
rs.head(3)

Result set has 28 rows and 46 columns.
CPU times: user 1.66 ms, sys: 239 μs, total: 1.9 ms
Wall time: 1.72 ms

	LAD 2021 Code	LAD 2021 Name	MSOA 2021 Code	MSOA 2021 Name	Total	F0 to 4	F5 to 9	F10 to 14	F15 to 19	F20 to 24	...	M60 to 64	M65 to 69	M70 to 74	M75 to 79	M80 to 84	M85 to 89	M90 and over	msoa11cd	msoa11hclnm	Laname
0	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000895	Waltham Forest 001	8363	208	233	250	228	215	...	242	209	153	194	137	93	45	E02000895	Chingford Green West	Waltham Forest
1	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000896	Waltham Forest 002	9322	256	278	264	230	241	...	257	218	216	190	111	111	54	E02000896	Chingford Green East	Waltham Forest
2	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000897	Waltham Forest 003	8438	233	262	276	212	209	...	205	162	136	98	104	87	24	E02000897	Friday Hill	Waltham Forest

3 rows × 46 columns

Without the how=inner, the result set would still have all of the rows but some of the columns would be nearly completely empty.

Non-Spatial Joins in DuckDB

SQL-based joins use very similar keywords (since Pandas is ‘copying’ SQL), but how we put together the query is quite different.

Joining by attribute

%%time

query = f'''
SELECT * 
FROM 
    read_parquet('data/MSOA_population_estimates.parquet') as n 
LEFT JOIN 
    read_csv('{cache_data(msoa_names_url, 'data')}', header=true) as m
ON 
    n."MSOA 2021 Code"=m.msoa11cd;
'''

db.sql(query).to_df().head(3)

+ data/MSOA-Names-1.20.csv found locally!
CPU times: user 32.8 ms, sys: 3.27 ms, total: 36.1 ms
Wall time: 30.6 ms

	LAD 2021 Code	LAD 2021 Name	MSOA 2021 Code	MSOA 2021 Name	Total	F0 to 4	F5 to 9	F10 to 14	F15 to 19	F20 to 24	...	M75 to 79	M80 to 84	M85 to 89	M90 and over	msoa11cd	msoa11nm	msoa11nmw	msoa11hclnm	msoa11hclnmw	Laname
0	E09000001	City of London	E02000001	City of London 001	10847	105	78	69	191	699	...	143	86	36	22	E02000001	City of London 001	City of London 001	City of London	None	City of London
1	E09000002	Barking and Dagenham	E02000002	Barking and Dagenham 001	8384	350	346	392	322	211	...	108	71	29	29	E02000002	Barking and Dagenham 001	Barking and Dagenham 001	Marks Gate	None	Barking and Dagenham
2	E09000002	Barking and Dagenham	E02000003	Barking and Dagenham 002	11803	494	431	359	330	372	...	125	91	40	19	E02000003	Barking and Dagenham 002	Barking and Dagenham 002	Chadwell Heath East	None	Barking and Dagenham

3 rows × 49 columns

Slower???

Without the data caching function, the query above may appear slower than the Pandas one but if you look at the timing information you’ll see that the actual time spent processing the data was less. How can that be? Notice that above we’re reading the CSV file from the House of Commons library as part of the join, so most of that delay is spent waiting for the CSV file to download! Another reason is that the files aren’t being loaded into memory first, but are being read: on small files this allows pandas to outperform DuckDB, but as the file size grows the performance profile will change radically.

Anyway, the download penalty is why I prefer to download a file once and save it locally rather than downloading the same file again and again. Plus it’s friendlier (and cheaper!) to the person or organisation providing the data to you.

Let’s take a look at the SQL:

SELECT * 
FROM 
    read_parquet('data/MSOA_population_estimates.parquet') as n 
LEFT JOIN 
    read_csv(msoa_names_url, header=true) as m
ON 
    n."MSOA 2021 Code"=m.msoa11cd;

Line-by-line:

SELECT every column (this is the *, change this if you want to only pull a subset of columns)
FROM the following tables (it doesn’t really matter if the tables are on this line or the next for legibility)
<table 1 from parquet> as n (we can now refer to the data from this table using the ‘alias’ n.; e.g. n.Total)
LEFT JOIN as a concept was been covered in the lecture
<table 2 from csv> as m (we now refer to the data from this table using the alias m.; e.g. m.geometry)
ON <left table matching column> = <right table matching column> (here, the unusual thing is the double-quotes around the column name required to deal with the fact that the name contains spaces).

Notice how there are parallels between even quite different languages here: if you have spaces or special characters or whatever in your column name then you’re going to need to handle that a little differently, and if you have two tables to join you have a left (aka first) one and a right (aka second) one and the order matters.

Constraining the Join

Now, running the same query to get the Waltham Forest data can be done two ways:

%%time

boro = 'Waltham Forest'
query = f'''
SELECT * 
FROM 
    read_parquet('data/MSOA_population_estimates.parquet') as n 
INNER JOIN 
    read_csv('{cache_data(msoa_names_url, 'data')}', header=true) as m
ON 
    n."MSOA 2021 Code"=m.msoa11cd
WHERE 
    m.Laname='{boro}';
'''

db.sql(query).to_df().head(3)

+ data/MSOA-Names-1.20.csv found locally!
CPU times: user 22.8 ms, sys: 1.92 ms, total: 24.7 ms
Wall time: 24.3 ms

	LAD 2021 Code	LAD 2021 Name	MSOA 2021 Code	MSOA 2021 Name	Total	F0 to 4	F5 to 9	F10 to 14	F15 to 19	F20 to 24	...	M75 to 79	M80 to 84	M85 to 89	M90 and over	msoa11cd	msoa11nm	msoa11nmw	msoa11hclnm	msoa11hclnmw	Laname
0	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000895	Waltham Forest 001	8363	208	233	250	228	215	...	194	137	93	45	E02000895	Waltham Forest 001	Waltham Forest 001	Chingford Green West	None	Waltham Forest
1	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000896	Waltham Forest 002	9322	256	278	264	230	241	...	190	111	111	54	E02000896	Waltham Forest 002	Waltham Forest 002	Chingford Green East	None	Waltham Forest
2	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000897	Waltham Forest 003	8438	233	262	276	212	209	...	98	104	87	24	E02000897	Waltham Forest 003	Waltham Forest 003	Friday Hill	None	Waltham Forest

3 rows × 49 columns

Everything here is basically the same except for:

We changed the LEFT JOIN to an INNER JOIN – this should make sense to you if you’ve watched the lectures.
We added a WHERE m.Laname=<borough name> which restricts the match to only those rows where the Local Authority name is Waltham Forest.

However, note that this query can also be written this way:

%%time

boro = 'Waltham Forest'
query = f'''
SELECT * 
FROM 
    read_parquet('data/MSOA_population_estimates.parquet') as n, 
    read_csv('{cache_data(msoa_names_url, 'data')}', header=true) as m
WHERE m.Laname='{boro}'
AND n."MSOA 2021 Code"=m.msoa11cd;
'''

db.sql(query).to_df().head(3)

+ data/MSOA-Names-1.20.csv found locally!
CPU times: user 23 ms, sys: 1.79 ms, total: 24.8 ms
Wall time: 24.1 ms

	LAD 2021 Code	LAD 2021 Name	MSOA 2021 Code	MSOA 2021 Name	Total	F0 to 4	F5 to 9	F10 to 14	F15 to 19	F20 to 24	...	M75 to 79	M80 to 84	M85 to 89	M90 and over	msoa11cd	msoa11nm	msoa11nmw	msoa11hclnm	msoa11hclnmw	Laname
0	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000895	Waltham Forest 001	8363	208	233	250	228	215	...	194	137	93	45	E02000895	Waltham Forest 001	Waltham Forest 001	Chingford Green West	None	Waltham Forest
1	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000896	Waltham Forest 002	9322	256	278	264	230	241	...	190	111	111	54	E02000896	Waltham Forest 002	Waltham Forest 002	Chingford Green East	None	Waltham Forest
2	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E02000897	Waltham Forest 003	8438	233	262	276	212	209	...	98	104	87	24	E02000897	Waltham Forest 003	Waltham Forest 003	Friday Hill	None	Waltham Forest

3 rows × 49 columns

The second way is a little easier to read, but it only allows you to do inner joins where attributes need to match in both tables for a row to be kept. This situation is such a common ‘use case’ that it makes sense to have this simpler syntax, but the previous code will work for inner, left, right, and outer joins.

Spatial Joins in Geopandas

Let’s try to find all of the listings that fall within the borough of Waltham Forest.

listings = gpd.read_parquet( cache_data(url, ddir) ).to_crs('epsg:27700')

+ data/geo/20250615-London-listings.geoparquet found locally!

This query implies two steps:

Subset the MSOA geo-data so that it only includes the Waltham Forest MSOAs.
Run a spatial query to find the listings that are within those MSOAs (we could, optionally, union the MSOAs to get the outline of the borough)

boro = 'Waltham Forest'
boro_gdf = msoa_gpkg[msoa_gpkg.LAD11NM==boro].copy()

# Do the spatial join
boro_listings = gpd.sjoin(listings, boro_gdf, predicate='within', rsuffix='_r')

# Layer the plots
f, ax = plt.subplots(1,1,figsize=(8,5))
boro_gdf.plot(color="white", edgecolor="black", linewidth=0.5, ax=ax)
boro_listings.plot(column='price', cmap='viridis', legend=True, s=1.5, aspect=1, ax=ax)

Warning

If you get ValueError: aspect must be finite and positive when you try to make a plot (this seems fairly common with .gpkg files) then you will need to specify aspect=1 in the plot(...) command.

Spatial Joins in SQL

After quite a bit of faff my conclusion is that, while you can do spatial queries in DuckDB it is a lot of work and probably not worth the effort at this time. The ‘issue’ is that spatial support is provided via the GDAL framework and this takes quite a different approach. After working it out, spatial queries do work fairly well if you do them entirely within DuckDB (reading, merging, and writing the data) and then load the results in a separate step using GeoPandas; however, you cannot get a GeoDataFrame back via db.query(<query>).to_df() since that only returns a Pandas data frame and the geometry column is unreadable. In addition, geoparquet support seems limited while GeoPackage performance is poor, so you’re basically losing all the advantages of a parquet-based workflow.

So the example is provided for reference only when you need to work with a geospatial data format and, on the whole, right now I’d recommend using GeoPandas and geoparquet files directly. In fact, if you read closely you’ll realise that this isn’t even a spatial join, it’s just outputting spatially-referenced data!

%%time

boro = 'Waltham Forest'

query = f'''
LOAD SPATIAL;
COPY(
  SELECT m.MSOA11CD, n.msoa11nm, n.Laname, m.geom 
  FROM 
      (SELECT MSOA11CD, geom FROM ST_Read("{cache_data(f'{host}/~jreades/data/MSOA-2011.gpkg', ddir)}")) AS m,
      read_csv("{cache_data(msoa_names_url, 'data')}") AS n
  WHERE m.MSOA11CD=n.msoa11cd
  AND n.Laname='{boro}'
) TO 'data/geo/merged.gpkg' WITH (FORMAT GDAL, DRIVER 'GPKG', LAYER_CREATION_OPTIONS 'WRITE_BBOX=YES');
'''

db.sql(query)
rs = gpd.read_file('data/geo/merged.gpkg')
print(f"Result set has {rs.shape[0]:,} rows and {rs.shape[1]:,} columns.")
rs.head(5)
rs.plot(aspect=1)

+ data/geo/MSOA-2011.gpkg found locally!
+ data/MSOA-Names-1.20.csv found locally!
Result set has 28 rows and 4 columns.
CPU times: user 318 ms, sys: 42.3 ms, total: 360 ms
Wall time: 98 ms

Worked Example

Let’s now try work through a practical example that combines everything we’ve just learned.

Load Geodata

A lot of additional geo-data can be accessed from the GeoPortal. And see also my discussion on lookup tables. For demonstration purposes we’re going to work the same set of files ‘as usual’:

spath = 'https://github.com/jreades/fsds/blob/master/data/src/' # source path
water = gpd.read_file( cache_data(spath+'Water.gpkg?raw=true', ddir) )
boros = gpd.read_file( cache_data(spath+'Boroughs.gpkg?raw=true', ddir) )
green = gpd.read_file( cache_data(spath+'Greenspace.gpkg?raw=true', ddir) )
msoas = gpd.read_file( cache_data(f'{host}/~jreades/data/MSOA-2011.gpkg', ddir) ).to_crs('epsg:27700')

+ data/geo/Water.gpkg found locally!
+ data/geo/Boroughs.gpkg found locally!
+ data/geo/Greenspace.gpkg found locally!
+ data/geo/MSOA-2011.gpkg found locally!

Select London MSOAs

🔗 Connections

One thing to remember here is that computers are exact. So if you say that the selection should only be of MSOAs within London then you actually need to think about whether a shared border qualifies as ‘within’. Watch the lectures again if you’re unsure, but that’s why here we take this slightly clunky approach of buffering the London boundary before doing the selection.

Union

As we don’t have a boundary file for London, we can generate use using the unary_union operator (as we do here) or using the dissolve() approach. Consider the pros and cons of each approach in terms of performance, output format, and legibility.

So here’s approach 1, which is a method call returning a GeoDataFrame (which is why we can call plot):

boros.dissolve().plot();

And here’s approach 2, which is an attribute and returns a raw polygon (so no reason to call plot, but it’s come back without the rest of the data frame!):

boros.unary_union

/var/folders/lk/__v0sp155qqfhjx0fmfkvw8c0000gn/T/ipykernel_36771/1763876522.py:1: DeprecationWarning:

The 'unary_union' attribute is deprecated, use the 'union_all()' method instead.

🔗 Connections

Notice how we’re also demonstrating some additional ways of plotting ‘on the fly’ (without generating a data frame) as well as (below) showing you how to zoom in/out.

Selecting London MSOAs

ldn = gpd.GeoDataFrame(gpd.GeoSeries(data=boros.union_all())).rename(columns={0:'geometry'}).set_geometry("geometry")
ldn = ldn.set_crs(epsg=27700)
ax  = ldn.plot(facecolor=(.5, .5, .9, .7))
msoas.plot(ax=ax, facecolor='none', edgecolor=(.9, .3, .3), linewidth=0.75)
ax.set_xlim(500000, 515000)
ax.set_ylim(180000, 195000);

A (Bad) First Join

ldn_msoas = gpd.sjoin(msoas, ldn, predicate='within', how='inner')
ax = ldn.plot(facecolor=(.5, .5, .9, .7))
ldn_msoas.plot(ax=ax, facecolor='none', edgecolor=(.9, .3, .3), linewidth=0.75)
ax.set_xlim(500000, 515000)
ax.set_ylim(180000, 195000);

What has gone wrong???

Before you move on to the solution, stop and actually think about why this hasn’t worked as you might (sensibly) have expected? This is another reason that you need to pay close attention to the differences between spatial and non-spatial joins.

Buffer and Join

In order to ensure that we get all the MSOAs within London we need to buffer the boundary by some amount to ensure that within returns what we want. If cover were easier to use then that option might be preferable.

Question

ldn['buffered'] = ldn.geometry.???(???)
ldn = ldn.set_geometry('buffered').set_crs(epsg=27700)
ax  = ldn.plot(facecolor=(.5, .5, .9, .5))
msoas.plot(ax=ax, facecolor='none', edgecolor=(.6, .6, .6, .6))
ax.set_xlim(500000, 515000)
ax.set_ylim(180000, 195000);

By default we want do an inner join because we want to drop everything that doesn’t line up between the two data sets (i.e. don’t keep the thousands of other non-London MSOAs).

Question

ldn_msoas = gpd.sjoin(msoas, ldn, predicate='???', how='inner')
ldn_msoas.plot()

Your result should be:

Important Note

If your plot above looks like the output from pandas and not geopandas then the list of columns and the documentation for set_geometry might help you to understand what is going wrong:

print(", ".join(ldn_msoas.columns.to_list()))

MSOA11CD, MSOA11NM, LAD11CD, LAD11NM, RGN11CD, RGN11NM, USUALRES, HHOLDRES, COMESTRES, POPDEN, HHOLDS, AVHHOLDSZ, geometry, index_right, geometry_right

It’s important to recognise that join and sjoin are not the same even though they may effectively perform the same function. An issue can arise if we join two geodata frames using the join function from pandas. The latter doesn’t know anything about spatial data and we can therefore ‘lose track’ of the geometry column. Worse, there are actually two geometry columns now, so we need to tell Geopandas which one to use!

The easiest way to do this is to simply rename the geometry we want and then set is as the active geometry. Here’s the code to use if you have a geometry_left column and aren’t able to show a map:

ldn_msoas = ldn_msoas.rename(columns={'geometry_left':'geometry'}).set_geometry('geometry')
ldn_msoas.drop(columns='geometry_right', inplace=True)

We also no longer really need to keep the full MSOA data set hanging about.

try:
    del(msoas)
except NameError:
    print("msoas already deleted.")

Question

Can you explain why the outputs of the dissolve and union_all look differnet? And use that as the basis for explaining why they are different?

Answer 1

How do you know that the units for the buffering operation are metres? 250 could be anything right?

Answer 2

Why do we need to buffer the London geometry before performing the within spatial join?

Answer 3

Create Borough and Regional Mappings

We don’t actually make use of these in this session, but both operations could be relevant to your final reports:

The Borough-to-Subregion mapping could help you to group your data into larger sets so that your resulst become more reobust. it also connects us to long-run patterns of socio-economic development in London.
The MSOA Names data set (which you used above) gives you something that you could use to label one or more ‘neighbourhoods’ on a map with names that are relevant. So rather than talking about “As you can see, Sutton 003, is…”, you can write “The Wrythe area of Sutton is significantly different from the surrounding areas…”

They also usefully test your understanding of regular expressions and a few other aspects covered in previous weeks.

Replace

You’ve done this before: notice that the MSOA Name contains the Borough name with a space and some digits at the end. Use a regex (in str.replace()) to extract the LA name from the MSOA name. See if you do this without having to find your previous answer!

Question

ldn_msoas['Borough'] = ldn_msoas.MSOA11NM.str.replace(r'???','',regex=True)

# Just check results look plausible; you should have:
# - 33 boroughs
# - A df shape of 983 x 13
print(ldn_msoas.Borough.unique())
print(f"There are {len(ldn_msoas.Borough.unique())} boroughs.")
print(f"Overall shape of data frame is {' x '.join([str(x) for x in ldn_msoas.shape])}")

Map

Now that we’ve got the borough names we can set up a mapping dict here so that we can apply it as part of the groupby operation below (you should have 33 keys when done):

mapping = {}
for b in ['Enfield','Waltham Forest','Redbridge','Barking and Dagenham','Havering','Greenwich','Bexley']:
    mapping[b]='Outer East and North East'
for b in ['Haringey','Islington','Hackney','Tower Hamlets','Newham','Lambeth','Southwark','Lewisham']:
    mapping[b]='Inner East'
for b in ['Bromley','Croydon','Sutton','Merton','Kingston upon Thames']:
    mapping[b]='Outer South'
for b in ['Wandsworth','Kensington and Chelsea','Hammersmith and Fulham','Westminster','Camden']:
    mapping[b]='Inner West'
for b in ['Richmond upon Thames','Hounslow','Ealing','Hillingdon','Brent','Harrow','Barnet','City of London']:
    mapping[b]='Outer West and North West'
print(len(mapping.keys()))

Question

ldn_msoas['Subregion'] = ldn_msoas.Borough.map(???)

And Save

ldn_msoas.to_parquet(ddir / 'London_MSOA_Names.geoparquet')

Spatial Join

Associate LA (Local Authority) names to the listings using a spatial join, but notice the how here:

Question

gdf_la = gpd.sjoin(listings, ???, predicate='???', how='left')
print(gdf_la.columns.to_list())

Tidy Up

gdf_la.drop(columns=['index_right','HECTARES','NONLD_AREA','ONS_INNER'], inplace=True)

You’ll need to look closely to check that the value_counts output squares with your expectations. If you don’t get 33 then there’s an issue and you’ll need to run the code in Section 9.5.2:

if len(gdf_la.NAME.unique()) == 33:
    print("All good...")
else:
    print("Need to run the next section of code...")
    print(f"Now there are... {len(gdf_la.NAME.unique())} boroughs?")
    gdf_la.NAME.value_counts(dropna=False)

All good...

Find Problematic Listings

If you were told that you need to run the next section of code then see if you can work out what happened…

try:
    print(gdf_la[gdf_la.NAME.isna()].sample(2)[['name', 'NAME']])
    ax = gdf_la[gdf_la.NAME.isna()].plot(figsize=(9,6), markersize=5, alpha=0.5)
    boros.plot(ax=ax, edgecolor='r', facecolor='None', alpha=0.5);
except ValueError as e:
   pass

In short: in some cases there may be records that fall outside of London because of Airbnb’s shuffling approach:

gdf_la.drop(index=gdf_la[gdf_la.NAME.isna()].index, axis=1, inplace=True)
print(f"Data frame is {gdf_la.shape[0]:,} x {gdf_la.shape[1]}")

Check and Save

ax = gdf_la.plot(column='NAME', markersize=0.5, alpha=0.5, figsize=(9,7))
boros.plot(ax=ax, edgecolor='r', facecolor='None', alpha=0.5);

You should get the following:

gdf_la.to_parquet(ddir / 'Listings_with_LA.geoparquet')

Question

Do you understand the difference between how='inner' and how='left'?

Create LA Data

Now that we’ve assigned every listing to a borough, we can derive aggregate values for different groups of zones.

Select LA

Select a LA that is relevant to you to explore further…

LA = 'Waltham Forest'

Spatial Join

The first thing we want to do is join MSOA identifiers to each listing. In both cases we want to constrain the data to only be for ‘our’ LA of interest since that will speed up the process substantially:

gdf_msoa = gpd.sjoin(
            gdf_la[gdf_la.NAME==LA].reset_index(), 
            ldn_msoas[ldn_msoas.Borough==LA][['MSOA11CD','MSOA11NM','USUALRES','HHOLDS','Subregion','geometry']], predicate='within')
gdf_msoa.head(2)

	index	id	listing_url	last_scraped	name	description	host_id	host_name	host_since	host_location	...	reviews_per_month	geometry	NAME	GSS_CODE	index_right	MSOA11CD	MSOA11NM	USUALRES	HHOLDS	Subregion
0	4	809481748064671744	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/809481748064671711	2024-06-15	4 min walk from the station 1 bedroom apartment	This indipendent apartment has a style. Well ...	30949469	Elisa	2015-04-10	London, United Kingdom	...	2.68	POINT (536184.011 187333.002)	Waltham Forest	E09000031	883	E02000916	Waltham Forest 022	9485	3506	Outer East and North East
1	6	738113134161127040	https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/738113134161127067	2024-06-14	Warm contemporary B&B in stylish Victorian house.	You’ll love the stylish decor of this charming...	483663228	Donald	2022-10-15	None	...	1.03	POINT (538477.558 191735.825)	Waltham Forest	E09000031	868	E02000901	Waltham Forest 007	9371	3553	Outer East and North East

2 rows × 42 columns

Aggregate

Now aggregate the data by MSOA, deriving median price and a count of the listings:

grdf_msoa = gdf_msoa.groupby('MSOA11NM').agg(
    listing_count = ('price','count'),
    median_price = ('price','median')
).reset_index()
print(f"Have {grdf_msoa.shape[0]:,} rows and {grdf_msoa.shape[1]:,} columns")
grdf_msoa.head(2)

Have 28 rows and 3 columns

	MSOA11NM	listing_count	median_price
0	Waltham Forest 001	11	110.0
1	Waltham Forest 002	11	90.0

Join (Again)

Here we see the difference between merge and join. You’ll notice that join operates by taking one data frame as the implicit ‘left’ table (the one which calls join) while the one that is passed to the join function is, implicitly, the ‘right’ table. Join operates only using indexes, so you’ll need to insert the code to specify the same index on both data frames, but this can be done on-the-fly as part of the joining operation:

msoa_gdf = grdf_msoa.set_index('MSOA11NM').join(
                ldn_msoas[ldn_msoas.Borough==LA].set_index('MSOA11NM'), 
                rsuffix='_r').set_geometry('geometry')
msoa_gdf.head(3)

	listing_count	median_price	MSOA11CD	LAD11CD	LAD11NM	RGN11CD	RGN11NM	USUALRES	HHOLDRES	COMESTRES	POPDEN	HHOLDS	AVHHOLDSZ	geometry	index_right	geometry_right	Borough	Subregion
MSOA11NM
Waltham Forest 001	11	110.0	E02000895	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E12000007	London	7979	7962	17	36.4	3271	2.4	MULTIPOLYGON (((537919.442 195742.428, 538051....	0	POLYGON ((528150.2 159979.2, 528100.9 160037.3...	Waltham Forest	Outer East and North East
Waltham Forest 002	11	90.0	E02000896	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E12000007	London	8814	8719	95	31.3	3758	2.3	MULTIPOLYGON (((539172.688 195540, 539696.813 ...	0	POLYGON ((528150.2 159979.2, 528100.9 160037.3...	Waltham Forest	Outer East and North East
Waltham Forest 003	6	96.5	E02000897	E09000031	Waltham Forest	E12000007	London	8077	7991	86	42.9	3345	2.4	MULTIPOLYGON (((538862.624 194017.438, 539001....	0	POLYGON ((528150.2 159979.2, 528100.9 160037.3...	Waltham Forest	Outer East and North East

msoa_gdf.plot(column='median_price', legend=True, figsize=(8,8));

You should get something like:

Save

Just so that we can pick up here without having to re-run all the preceding cells.

msoa_gdf.to_parquet(ddir / f'{LA}-MSOA_data.geoparquet')

Question

Do you understand the differences between pd.merge and df.join? and gpd.sjoin?

Do you understand why it may be necessary to set_geometry in some cases?

Footnotes

One could imagine, for instance, that you want to present the data in a table in which case you want the zero because there needs to be a value for each cell in the table.↩︎